From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.

California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division
Aug 14, 2012
No. A132927 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2012)

Opinion


Page 361a

208 Cal.App.4th 361a __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ LORENA NELSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LEGACY PARTNERS RESIDENTIAL, INC., Defendant and Respondent. A132927 California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division August 14, 2012

THE COURT.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 18, 2012 (207 Cal.App.4th 1115;___Cal.Rptr.3d___), advance report], be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

1. On page 19 of the opinion [207 Cal.App.4th 1134, 1st par., lines 4-8], delete the second full sentence on the page that begins, “It cites no prior legislative expression...., ” and replace it with the following sentence:

It cites no clear precedent for its holdings that “an individual who files a class... action regarding wages, hours or working conditions” is per se “engaged in conduct protected by Section 7, ” or that the FAA’s policy favoring arbitration must yield to the NLRA in the manner it proposes. (Horton, at p. 3.)

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.

California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division
Aug 14, 2012
No. A132927 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LORENA NELSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LEGACY PARTNERS RESIDENTIAL…

Court:California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

No. A132927 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2012)