From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neithercut v. Ebanks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1979
72 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

November 26, 1979


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 18, 1979, as, upon granting her motion to discharge her attorney, awarded the outgoing attorney "15% of the gross recovery herein." Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision establishing the percentage due the outgoing attorney and substituting therefor a provision that the amount of the attorney's lien shall be determined by the court on a quantum meruit basis at the conclusion of the litigation. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff clearly is entitled to substitute attorneys at any time during the litigation, and the discharged attorney is entitled to be compensated for services rendered. However, at this early stage of the action, a fixed percentage of the recovery set before the relative contributions of services rendered by respective counsel can be determined, is premature. Rabin, J.P., Cohalan, Margett and Gibbons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Neithercut v. Ebanks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1979
72 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Neithercut v. Ebanks

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET NEITHERCUT, Appellant, v. ESTON EBANKS et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1979

Citations

72 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Mercado

Inasmuch as departing counsel has performed work for Plaintiff until now, it is entitled to a charging lien,…