From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neighbors v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 21, 2007
230 S.W.3d 661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. ED 88789.

August 21, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Gloria C. Reno, Judge.

Neighbors Credit Union, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Loretta Williams, Normandy, MO, pro se.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.



ORDER


Loretta Williams appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Neighbors Credit Union. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find appellant's brief severely deficient. The brief wholly fails to comply with Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04, and as such precludes meaningful review. Dismissal of the appeal is appropriate under these circumstances. Nonetheless, after reviewing the claims ex gratia, as best we can discern from appellant's brief there is no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Neighbors v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 21, 2007
230 S.W.3d 661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Neighbors v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION, Respondent, v. Loretta WILLIAMS, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Aug 21, 2007

Citations

230 S.W.3d 661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Graves

We are of the opinion that it did. An oral gift of land is not enforceable unless there is actual possession…

Graves v. Simms Oil Company

We are of the opinion that it did. An oral gift of land is not enforceable unless there is actual possession…