From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neidigh v. Merit Life Insurance Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0242 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0242.

March 13, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of defendant's motion to compel arbitration (Doc. 9) under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1- 16, requesting dismissal of the above-captioned case or, in the alternative, a stay pending arbitration, and it appearing that plaintiff has not filed a brief in opposition as of the date of this order, see L.R. 7.6 ("Any party opposing any motion shall file a responsive brief. . . . [or] shall be deemed not to oppose such motion."), that the arbitration agreement itself is not at issue (see Doc. 1, Ex. A), see 9 U.S.C. §§ 2- 4; Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood Conklin Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 395, 403-04 (1967), and that all of plaintiff's claims are covered by the arbitration agreement (see Doc. 1, Ex. A; Doc. 8, Ex. A at 7-8; Doc. 8, Ex. B at 7-8), see In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. Sales Practice Litig., 133 F.3d 225, 231 (3d Cir. 1998) ("[W]hen it cannot be said `with positive assurance' that the parties have clearly and unequivocally excepted a certain dispute from arbitration, the court must compel arbitration."); see also Dancu v. Coopers Lybrand, 778 F. Supp. 832, 835 (E.D. Pa. 1991) (holding that, where all claims are subject to arbitration under the FAA, "the appropriate procedure is dismissal of the action without prejudice"), it is hereby ORDERED that:

The order of court dated February 27, 2006 (Doc. 12) directed plaintiff to file a brief in opposition on or before March 10, 2006.

1. The motion to compel arbitration (Doc. 9) is GRANTED. See 9 U.S.C. §§ 1- 16; In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. Sales Practice Litig., 133 F.3d 225, 231 (3d Cir. 1998); see also L.R. 7.6.
2. The above-captioned action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Dancu v. Coopers Lybrand, 778 F. Supp. 832, 835 (E.D. Pa. 1991).

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Neidigh v. Merit Life Insurance Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0242 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Neidigh v. Merit Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN NEIDIGH, Executrix of the Estate of David D. Lauver, Plaintiff v…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 13, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0242 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 13, 2006)