From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Negron v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2022
20-CV-9511 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-9511 (CM)

06-02-2022

Magali Negron, Plaintiffs, v. Target Corporation, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

John G. Koeltl, District Judge.

The Court having been advised (Docket No. 39) that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within (30) thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same (30) thirtyday period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Negron v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2022
20-CV-9511 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Negron v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Magali Negron, Plaintiffs, v. Target Corporation, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 2, 2022

Citations

20-CV-9511 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2022)