From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Negro v. Superior Court (Navalimpianti USA, Inc.)

California Court of Appeals, Sixth District
Nov 18, 2014
No. H040146 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2014)

Opinion


Page 549a

231 Cal.App.4th 549a __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ MATTEO NEGRO, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent NAVALIMPIANTI USA, INC., Real Party in Interest. H040146 California Court of Appeals, Sixth District November 18, 2014

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 21, 2014, 230 Cal.App.4th 879;___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___, be modified as follows:

1. On the Court’s own motion, the opinion is modified to delete footnote 1 on page 5 [230 Cal.App.4th 886, advance report, fn. 1], which will require renumbering of all subsequent footnotes.

2. On the signature page, line 2 [230 Cal.App.4th 879, advance report, 2d par. of the Summary, line 14, and 230 Cal.App.4th 905, advance report, last par., line 1], the name "PREMO, J." is replaced with “ELIA, J.” so the signature page reflects the correct panel as follows:

3. Except as granted above, petitioner’s request to modify the opinion is denied. The phrase “this order” on page 31 of the typed opinion [230 Cal.App.4th 905, advance report, line 7], speaks as of the date of the trial court’s issuance of an order complying with this court’s mandate, and not as of the date of this court’s decision.

There is no change in judgment.


Summaries of

Negro v. Superior Court (Navalimpianti USA, Inc.)

California Court of Appeals, Sixth District
Nov 18, 2014
No. H040146 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Negro v. Superior Court (Navalimpianti USA, Inc.)

Case Details

Full title:MATTEO NEGRO, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Sixth District

Date published: Nov 18, 2014

Citations

No. H040146 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2014)