Opinion
Civil Action 5:21-cv-269 (MTT)
08-02-2023
ERIC M NEGRIN, Plaintiff, v. Captain BUSTER KING, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE
United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle recommends granting the defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 52; 54). Doc. 62. Negrin did not respond to the defendants' motions. Id. at 1. Despite Negrin's failure to respond, the Magistrate Judge considered the merits of the defendants' motion and reviewed the defendants' citations to the record to confirm that there were no disputes of material fact. Id. at 3 n.2. The Magistrate Judge concluded the undisputed facts demonstrated that the defendants were not deliberately indifferent to Negrin's serious medical need or his safety. Id. at 11-24. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the defendants retaliated against Negrin. Id.
The same day the defendants moved for summary judgment the Court sent Negrin a Griffith notice advising him of the significance of the defendants' motions. Doc. 55.
Negrin does not object to the Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court reviews the Recommendation for clear error.The Court finds none. Therefore, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation (Doc. 62) is
However, even if reviewed de novo, the result would be the same.
ADOPTED and made the Order of the Court. Accordingly, the defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 52; 54) are GRANTED.
SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of August, 2023.