From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Negrete v. Dong

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 3, 2021
2:21-cv-0429 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0429 CKD P

12-03-2021

JOSE NEGRETE, Plaintiff, v. JULIE DONG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 19, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within 30 days and was warned that failure to do so would result in recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Negrete v. Dong

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 3, 2021
2:21-cv-0429 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Negrete v. Dong

Case Details

Full title:JOSE NEGRETE, Plaintiff, v. JULIE DONG, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 3, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0429 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2021)