From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 11, 2016
644 F. App'x 1024 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2015-1422 2015-1821

04-11-2016

JOSEPH NEEV, Petitioner-Appellant v. ALCON LENSX, INC., Respondent-Appellee

DAVID ALAN MAKMAN, Law Offices of David A. Makman, San Mateo, CA, argued for petitioner-appellant. BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by ERIC MARTIN ACKER, MARY PRENDERGAST, San Diego, CA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:14-cv-00660-GHK-JEM, Judge George H. King.

JUDGMENT

DAVID ALAN MAKMAN, Law Offices of David A. Makman, San Mateo, CA, argued for petitioner-appellant. BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by ERIC MARTIN ACKER, MARY PRENDERGAST, San Diego, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 11, 2016

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 11, 2016
644 F. App'x 1024 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Neev v. Alcon Lensx, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH NEEV, Petitioner-Appellant v. ALCON LENSX, INC., Respondent-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 2016

Citations

644 F. App'x 1024 (Fed. Cir. 2016)