From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neenan v. Woodside Astoria Transp. Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

November, 1931.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. On this record there is no question presented as to the right of contribution between the defendants. If there is any basis for the claim of defendant Huppmann that he is not liable in contribution the question should be presented on a motion or in a separate action. As the plaintiff is not appearing on this appeal, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Neenan v. Woodside Astoria Transp. Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Neenan v. Woodside Astoria Transp. Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARY NEENAN, Respondent, v. WOODSIDE ASTORIA TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Neenan v. Woodside Astoria Transportation Co., Inc.

Huppman took an appeal from the Neenan judgment, but before the appeal reached this court the Woodside Co.…