Neely v. Hurst

Full title: MICHAEL M. NEELY, Plaintiff v. DEBRA K. HURST, I.R.S. "ACS Employee…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 7, 2009

Civil Action No. 09-176 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-176.

July 7, 2009

ORDER

ARTHUR SCHWAB, District Judge

AND NOW, this 7^th day of July, 2009, after the Plaintiff, Michael M. Neely, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until June 29, 2009, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is dismissed with prejudice as against Debra K. Hurst and R.A. Mitchel;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is remanded forthwith to state court for all further proceedings against Nancy Werme.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.