From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neely v. Director, California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 17, 2009
Case No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P.

April 17, 2009


ORDER


Respondents have requested a second thirty (30) day extension of time in which to file Respondents' response to Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus filed June 20, 2008. However, between the time the court directed respondent to respond to the petition and the filing of the underlying motion, petitioner has filed an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (docket no. 9). The court finds it appropriate to direct respondent to respond to this amended petition.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Respondents are granted an extension of time to and including June 15, 2009, in which to file Respondents' response to Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket no. 12).


Summaries of

Neely v. Director, California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 17, 2009
Case No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Neely v. Director, California Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM STEWART NEELY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 17, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2009)