From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neeley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 5, 2009
280 S.W.3d 737 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. WD69639.

February 24, 2009. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 31, 2009. Application for Transfer Denied May 5, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, Michael J. Maloney, Judge.

Larry D. Neeley, Cameron, pro se. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, J., and THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J.


ORDER


Larry Neeley appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. On appeal, Neeley argues that he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel because counsel raised, in an amended Rule 29.15 motion, only one of the nine issues Neeley raised in his pro se motion. The substance of Neeley's claim does not address any of the recognized situations implicating the narrow abandonment exception to the Rule 75.01 time limit on the circuit court's jurisdiction.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Neeley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 5, 2009
280 S.W.3d 737 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Neeley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry D. NEELEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: May 5, 2009

Citations

280 S.W.3d 737 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)