From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nebraska Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farmland Indus

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Dec 11, 1987
416 N.W.2d 221 (Neb. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-054.

Filed December 11, 1987.

Appeal and Error. Where the appellant's brief does not contain specific assignments of error as required by Neb. Rev. Stat 25-1919 (Reissue 1985) and Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(1)d(rev. 1986), the judgment will be affirmed in the absence of any plain error this court may note

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: JOHN E. CLARK, Judge. Affirmed.

Eugene L. Hillman of McCormack, Cooney, Mooney, Hillman Pirtle, for appellant.

Ronald H. Stave of Stave, Coffey Swenson, P.C. for appellees.

BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ., and BRODKEY, J., Retired, and COLWELL, D.J., Retired.


The appellant's brief that was filed May 6, 1986, contained no specific assignments of error as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1919 (Reissue 1985) and Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(1)d(rev. 1986).

Having reviewed the record and finding neither compliance with those rules nor plain error, we affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Nebraska Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farmland Indus

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Dec 11, 1987
416 N.W.2d 221 (Neb. 1987)
Case details for

Nebraska Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farmland Indus

Case Details

Full title:NEBRASKA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., APPELLANT v. FARMLAND INDUSTRIES INC., ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Dec 11, 1987

Citations

416 N.W.2d 221 (Neb. 1987)
416 N.W.2d 221

Citing Cases

State v. Tracy

The defendant, Matthew R. Tracy, appeals from an order of the district court for Douglas County denying his…

State v. Lange

Therefore, we must search the record for plain error. Nebraska Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farmland Indus., 227 Neb. 93,…