Opinion
May, 1908.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented on the authority of Berkery v. Erie R.R. Co. ( 55 App. Div. 489; affd., 172 N.Y. 636).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Nease v. New York Central Hudson River R.R. Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1908
126 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Summaries of
Nease v. New York Central Hudson River R.R. Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1908
126 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for
Nease v. New York Central Hudson River R.R. Co.
Case Details
Full title:Samuel Nease, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1908
Citations
126 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)