From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neary v. TOWN.INS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2006
32 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2006-02708.

September 19, 2006.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and negligence, the defendant Lincoln Brokerage Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated February 3, 2006, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Wade Clark Mulcahy, New York, N.Y. (David F. Tavella of counsel), for appellant.

Mark E. Seitelman, New York, N.Y. (Donald D. Casale of counsel), for respondents

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the action was not time-barred. The causes of action accrued and the relevant statutes of limitations began to run on August 5, 2002, the date the Tower Insurance policy at issue was procured and issued ( see St. George Hotel Assoc, v Shurkin, 12 AD3d 359, 360). Contrary to the appellant's contention that the same error constituting the alleged breach of contract may have been made earlier in connection with its procurement of coverage from a different insurer does not result in an earlier accrual date for the instant causes of action relating to the Tower Insurance policy ( see Vic Char Realty, Inc. v Alliance Plus, Inc., 26 AD3d 278; cf. Mauro v Niemann Agency, 303 AD2d 468).


Summaries of

Neary v. TOWN.INS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2006
32 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Neary v. TOWN.INS

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND H. NEAEY, SR., et al., Respondents, v. TOWER INSURANCE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6567
820 N.Y.S.2d 813

Citing Cases

Tucker v. M T Ins

The record reflects, however, that there were, before the April 1, 2002 policy renewal, both "further…

Crimaudo v. Allstate Insurance

Whether posited as negligence (three years), or breach or reformation of contract (six years), this is when…