From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nealy v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 20, 2005
902 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

Case No. SC05-138.

April 20, 2005.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists). Petitioner's motion to expedite is hereby denied as moot.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and CANTERO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nealy v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 20, 2005
902 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Nealy v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY NEALY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 20, 2005

Citations

902 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2005)