Opinion
SA-24-CV-00273-JKP
07-16-2024
PAUL NEALY, Plaintiff, v. CNAC, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JASON PULLIAM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad's Report and Recommendation (R&R) entered in the above-captioned case. See ECF No. 8. The parties filed no objections to the R&R and the deadline to do so has passed. Judge Bemporad recommends the Court dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a)(1) and 12(h)(3). After due consideration, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety (ECF No. 8) and DISMISSES this case for lack of jurisdiction.
In a case such as this, where no party has objected to a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In such cases, the Court need only review the Report and Recommendation and determine whether they are either clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989). The Court reviewed the R&R and found it to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, and DISMISSES this case for lack of jurisdiction. See ECF No. 8.
The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
It is so ORDERED.