Opinion
06-23-00241-CR
01-19-2024
TREVON MARQUEZ DEUNTE NEAL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Do Not Publish
Date Submitted: January 18, 2024
On Appeal from the 5th District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 22F1240-005
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jeff Rambin Justice
Trevon Marquez Deunte Neal pled guilty to evading arrest or detention and, pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court sentenced Neal to twenty months' confinement. Despite the trial court's certification that this was a plea-bargain case and that Neal had no right of appeal, Neal timely filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that we are without jurisdiction over this cause due to Neal's plea bargain with the State, we will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea-bargain cases. Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:
(2) . . . In a plea[-]bargain case-that is, a case in which a defendant's plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant-a defendant may appeal only:
(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,
(B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal, or
(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court (1) that this specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute, (2) that Neal filed a motion that was ruled on before trial, or (3) that Neal obtained the trial court's permission to appeal. To the contrary, the trial court's certification of Neal's right of appeal indicates that he has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court's certification indicates that there is no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
On November 30, 2023, we informed Neal of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over his appeal and afforded him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. Neal did not file a response to our November 30 correspondence.
Because Neal has no right of appeal due to his plea bargain with the State and because the trial court's certification correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.