Opinion
No. 2D14–1997.
10-10-2014
Antonio Maurice Neal, pro se.
Antonio Maurice Neal, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Thomas, 487 So.2d 1043 (Fla.1986) ; Guilford v. State, 88 So.3d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ; Scott v. State, 42 So.3d 923 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ; Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Cole v. State, 716 So.2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ; Jones v. Crosby, 857 So.2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) ; O'Bryant v. State, 765 So.2d 745 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ; Gamble v. State, 723 So.2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) ; Fraley v. State, 641 So.2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) ; Newton v. State, 603 So.2d 558 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.