From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. Spitz & Peck Floral Decorators

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2015
29 N.Y.S.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)

Opinion

No. 570967/15.

12-30-2015

Joann NEAL and Kenneth Neal, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. SPITZ AND PECK FLORAL DECORATORS, Defendant–Appellant.


Order (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), dated June 12, 2015, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Plaintiffs-tenants commenced this action to recover damages for losses sustained in a burglary allegedly caused by defendant's act of placing tape over the lock on the subject building's front security gate. Multiple issues of fact regarding defendant's liability preclude summary judgment, including whether the burglar(s) gained entry to the building as a result of the taped over lock.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur


Summaries of

Neal v. Spitz & Peck Floral Decorators

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2015
29 N.Y.S.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)
Case details for

Neal v. Spitz & Peck Floral Decorators

Case Details

Full title:Joann NEAL and Kenneth Neal, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. SPITZ AND PECK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 30, 2015

Citations

29 N.Y.S.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)