From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. Slocomb

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 2, 2007
Case No: 3:06cv17/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 2, 2007)

Opinion

Case No: 3:06cv17/MCR/EMT.

May 2, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 3, 2007. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's claims against the nursing staff Defendants regarding the denial of adequate medical care are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. The clerk is directed to change the docket to reflect that Officer Bolton and Doctor Hart are the only Defendants in this action.

4. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for service of the fourth amended complaint on Officer Bolton and Doctor Hart.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Neal v. Slocomb

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 2, 2007
Case No: 3:06cv17/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 2, 2007)
Case details for

Neal v. Slocomb

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL T. NEAL, Plaintiff, v. SGT. SLOCOMB, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 2, 2007

Citations

Case No: 3:06cv17/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 2, 2007)