From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. Reslan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2020
CV 19-09291 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2020)

Opinion

CV 19-09291 PA (ASx)

01-16-2020

Edmond Neal, Plaintiff, v. Badria Reslan, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's January 16, 2020 Minute Order dismissing this action for failure to comply with the Court's orders,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 16, 2020

/s/_________

Percy Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Neal v. Reslan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2020
CV 19-09291 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Neal v. Reslan

Case Details

Full title:Edmond Neal, Plaintiff, v. Badria Reslan, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2020

Citations

CV 19-09291 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2020)

Citing Cases

Zahedi v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

"Dismissal is appropriate 'where at least four factors support dismissal, or where at least three factors…

Torres v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

“Dismissal is appropriate ‘where at least four factors support dismissal, or where at least three factors…