From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NEAL v. MACE

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1883
89 N.C. 171 (N.C. 1883)

Opinion

(October Term, 1883.)

Practice — Affirmation of Judgment.

Where no case is settled on appeal and no errors are assigned in the record, the judgment of the court will be affirmed.

CIVIL ACTION to declare the defendant a trustee of the plaintiff and demanding the execution of a deed, tried at Spring Term, 1883, of BURKE Superior Court, before Gudger, J.

The defendant appealed.

Messrs. Sinclair Sinclair, for plaintiff.

No counsel for defendant.


It does not appear in the record that any case has been settled upon appeal for this court, nor are errors assigned in the record. Upon examination, we find that the court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the action. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. Swepson v. Clayton, 74 N.C. 551; Bryant v. Fisher, 85 N.C. 669; McDaniel v. Pollock, 87 N.C. 503. Judgment affirmed. Let this be certified.

No error. Affirmed.


Summaries of

NEAL v. MACE

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1883
89 N.C. 171 (N.C. 1883)
Case details for

NEAL v. MACE

Case Details

Full title:NANCY NEAL v. JOHN MACE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1883

Citations

89 N.C. 171 (N.C. 1883)

Citing Cases

Rencher v. Anderson

Mr. John W. Graham, for the defendant. ( State v. Murray, 80 N.C. 364; State v. Edney, Ibid., 360; State v.…

Manufacturing Co. v. Simmons

No counsel for defendant. ( S. v. Crook, 91 N.C. 536; S. v. Byrd, 93 N.C. 624; Neal v. Mace, 89 N.C. 171;…