From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. Loncar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 9, 2014
116 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-9

In the Matter of David Shaun NEAL, petitioner, v. Clifford LONCAR, etc., respondent.

David Shaun Neal, Tuxedo, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Jacobowitz & Gubits, LLP, Walden, N.Y. (Donald G. Nichol of counsel), for respondent.


David Shaun Neal, Tuxedo, N.Y., petitioner pro se.Jacobowitz & Gubits, LLP, Walden, N.Y. (Donald G. Nichol of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 to remove the respondent, Clifford Loncar, from public office in the Town of Tuxedo, Orange County.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The misconduct alleged, even if the allegations are accepted as true, does not rise to the level of malfeasance, misconduct, maladministration, or malversation necessary to justify the extreme remedy of removal from public office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 ( see Matter of Haase v. DelVecchio, 90 A.D.3d 756, 934 N.Y.S.2d 330;Matter of Hayes v. Ansel–McCabe, 83 A.D.3d 1180, 920 N.Y.S.2d 479;Matter of Montanino v. Rowley, 39 A.D.3d 653, 654, 831 N.Y.S.2d 916). SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Neal v. Loncar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 9, 2014
116 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Neal v. Loncar

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of David Shaun NEAL, petitioner, v. Clifford LONCAR, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 778
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2440