From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. Barrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 12, 2022
2:20-cv-02281-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02281-JAD-NJK

12-12-2022

ISAIAH S. NEAL, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY BARBARA M. BARRETT, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 48]

Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendants' proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 48. Proposed discovery plans must be submitted as a stipulation. Local Rule 26-1(a). Written stipulations must be signed by all parties or their attorneys. Local Rule 7-1(a). “[I]n cases in which the parties disagree on the form or contents of the discovery plan, a statement of each party's position on each point in dispute” must be included with the proposed discovery plan. Local Rule 26-1(a). Defendants' proposed discovery plan fails to include a statement of the disputed issues between the parties. See Docket No. 48. Additionally, Defendants' proposed discovery plan has not been signed by Plaintiff, id. at 3, and is therefore not a properly formatted stipulation.

Accordingly, Defendants' proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. A properly formatted joint proposed discovery plan must be submitted no later than December 23, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Neal v. Barrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 12, 2022
2:20-cv-02281-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Neal v. Barrett

Case Details

Full title:ISAIAH S. NEAL, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY BARBARA M. BARRETT, et al…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 12, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-02281-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2022)