Higgins School District being wholly in Kent County, the County School Board of Dickens County had no jurisdiction over it. Naruna Common School Dist. No. 8, Burnet County v. Steele, Tex.Civ.App.1950, 229 S.W.2d 107, ref. [157 Tex. 120] The case of Handley v. Coker, Tex.Civ.App.1952, 248 S.W.2d 814, wr.ref., involved the validity of an order of a county board seeking to consolidate a dormant district to an operating district under the provisions of Article 2922-18. It was there held that the County Board could correct its orders at a time later than the term at which the order was first entered upon the ascertainment by the board that facts upon which it based its first order were incorrect.
Under this state of the record, where the Kent County Board of Trustees exercised discretion and decreed the Higgins District dormant and having attached it to the Girard District, and having been accepted by the Girard District and taxes collected as was done and such proceedings acted upon, its action should not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion, fraud, undue influence or the like is shown. Naruna Common School District No. 8, Burnet County v. Steele, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W.2d 107. We are of the opinion that the action of the Kent County School Trustees was recognized, approved and acted upon by the appellee, and that the action of said trustees was validated by Article 2815g-48, Vernon's Tex.Civ.St.