From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nazzaro v. Moksel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 4, 1986
483 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-2432.

March 4, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Richard S. Fuller, J.

Joseph Nazzaro, in pro per.

H. Allan Tucker, Hollywood, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.


The parties entered into a stipulation for dismissal of the foreclosure action which contained a condition that the defendant pay the 1983 ad valorem taxes on the subject property by June 30, 1984. The defendant tendered payment of the taxes on June 29, 1984. For administrative reasons, however, the tax collector refused to accept payment until July 17, 1984, on which date the defendant paid the taxes in full. The plaintiff sought and obtained a final judgment of foreclosure on the basis of this default with regard to the tax payment. We find that equity requires that a defendant in foreclosure be excused where, as here, the defendant is technically in default due to circumstances beyond his control, the default is cured by the defendant as soon as practicably possible, and the default has not resulted in an impairment of the security. See Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. Knight, 98 Fla. 1004, 124 So. 751, 756 (1929); Schechtman v. Grobbel, 226 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969); Overholser v. Theroux, 149 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Accordingly, the final judgment of foreclosure is reversed.


Summaries of

Nazzaro v. Moksel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 4, 1986
483 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Nazzaro v. Moksel

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH NAZZARO, APPELLANT, v. MARY R. DUPONT, MOKSEL F/K/A MARY R. DUPONT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 4, 1986

Citations

483 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PA

Moreover, the Periwinkle default was a technical default—there is no allegation that Defendants failed to…

Nazzaro v. Moksel

We reverse the order under review upon a holding that the said order was erroneously entered without the…