From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nazario v. Chavez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-09081, 2003-01897

Argued May 22, 2003.

June 16, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J), entered May 8, 2002, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered June 28, 2002, which, upon the order, dismissed the complaint.

David W. McCarthy (Margaret DeVivo, Deer Park, N.Y., of counsel), for appellants.

Curtis, Vasile, Devine McElhenny, Merrick, N.Y. (Michael J. Dorry of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with entry of the judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1]).

In this action where the plaintiff Raymond Nazario alleges that he slipped and fell on snow and/or ice on the defendants' premises, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint. The defendants presented evidence that when Mr. Nazario slipped and fell it was either still snowing or the snowfall had only just stopped (see Joseph v. Danice Stores of Nostrand Ave., 290 A.D.2d 536). In opposition, the plaintiffs could only speculate that the fall was caused by preexisting ice (see Bernstein v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 1020; Smith v. 1327 Jefferson Realty, 300 A.D.2d 466; Pelliccio v. TCW Realty Fund VIA Holding Co, 291 A.D.2d 388).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nazario v. Chavez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Nazario v. Chavez

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND NAZARIO, ET AL., appellants, v. TELMO CHAVEZ, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 490

Citing Cases

Levenkova v. City of N.Y.

Any assertion that the Plaintiff slipped on an icy condition that had accumulated because of the January 27,…

Gray v. City of N.Y

"A reasonable period of time is the period 'within which the municipality should have taken notice of the icy…