From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 21, 2020
598 S.W.3d 146 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 82170

04-21-2020

Brandon NAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.


Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Brandon Naylor appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief wherein Naylor alleged he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his attorney failed to adequately and effectively cross-examine a witness, and Naylor was ultimately convicted of first-degree burglary and third-degree assault. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Naylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 21, 2020
598 S.W.3d 146 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Naylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brandon NAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Apr 21, 2020

Citations

598 S.W.3d 146 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

State v. Winters

Points One and Two Winters's first point on appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation regarding…