From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naylor v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
1:11cv00946 DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

1:11cv00946 DLB PC

01-31-2012

JERRY NAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN HUBBARD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND AS MOOT


(Document 9)

Plaintiff Jerry Naylor ("Plaintiff") is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 10, 2011.

On June 27, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The Court disregarded the motion on July 11, 2011, explaining that Plaintiff could file one amended complaint without seeking leave of Court. Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint by August 15, 2011.

On July 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed his first amended complaint along with another motion to amend. Plaintiff seeks to add "clearer" facts, change a named Defendant, add exhibits and lower the amount of requested damages. It appears, however, that the requested changes were made in the first amended complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Naylor v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
1:11cv00946 DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Naylor v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:JERRY NAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN HUBBARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

1:11cv00946 DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)