From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navy v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 9, 2014
NO. 09-13-00384-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-13-00384-CR

04-09-2014

BRYANT K. NAVY A/K/A BRYANT KEITH NAVY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-16024


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Bryant K. Navy a/k/a Bryant Keith Navy pleaded guilty to felony theft as a prior felony offender. The trial court found Navy guilty and assessed punishment at two years of confinement in a state jail facility, but then suspended imposition of sentence, placed Navy on community supervision for five years, and assessed a fine of $500. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Navy's community supervision. Navy pleaded "not true" to the alleged violation of the terms of the community supervision order. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Navy violated the terms of the community supervision order, revoked Navy's community supervision, and imposed a sentence of two years of confinement in a state jail facility.

Navy had two prior convictions for misdemeanor theft, which increased his offense from a Class A misdemeanor to a state jail felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2013).

Navy's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On January 2, 2014, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Navy.

We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Navy may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
--------

AFFIRMED.

__________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ


Summaries of

Navy v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 9, 2014
NO. 09-13-00384-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Navy v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRYANT K. NAVY A/K/A BRYANT KEITH NAVY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS…

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-13-00384-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2014)