From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navarro v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 8, 2007
249 S.W.3d 811 (Ark. 2007)

Opinion

No. CR 06-549.

Opinion delivered February 8, 2007.

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION TO FILE BELATED BRIEF — ATTORNEY ERROR ADMITTED. — Appellant's motion to file belated brief was granted where counsel for appellant accepted the responsibility for failing to file appellant's brief by the final deadline and admitted that her failure constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.

Motion to File Belated Brief; granted.

Smith Moore, PLC, by: Susan T. Lusby, for appellant.

No response.


[1] Appellant is represented in this appeal by Susan Lusby. The original deadline to file appellant's brief was October 17, 2006. Counsel requested and received a forty-five day extension to file appellant's brief, up to and including December 1, 2006. Appellant filed another motion for an extension of time to file appellant's brief on November 28, 2006, which the court denied because the earlier extension was a final one. In this motion to file belated brief filed on January 18, 2007, counsel for appellant accepts responsibility for failing to file appellant's brief by the December 1, 2006, deadline, admits that her failure constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel, and requests an extension of time to file the brief to February 5, 2007. In a separate motion filed on February 5, 2007, counsel for appellant requests an additional two days to file appellant's brief to February 7, 2007.

The motion is granted and the time for filing appellant's brief is extended to February 7, 2007. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Navarro v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 8, 2007
249 S.W.3d 811 (Ark. 2007)
Case details for

Navarro v. State

Case Details

Full title:Fernando NAVARRO v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 8, 2007

Citations

249 S.W.3d 811 (Ark. 2007)
249 S.W.3d 811

Citing Cases

Wertz v. State

This court exercises its discretion in granting extensions to file briefs, but it has repeatedly referred…