From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navarro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 3, 1996
670 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2032.

April 3, 1996.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140 (g) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Stanford Blake, Judge.

Michael H. Tarkoff, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


The defendant, Claudio Navarro, appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. After careful review of the record, we find that the motion was neither a successive motion nor untimely filed. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Ray v. State, 480 So.2d 228, 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (movant entitled to evidentiary hearing on sworn claim of affirmative misadvice of counsel that movant would receive gain time on a mandatory minimum sentence); Eady v. State, 604 So.2d 559 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Navarro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 3, 1996
670 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Navarro v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDIO NAVARRO, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 3, 1996

Citations

670 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)