From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navarro v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 22, 2014
No. ED CV 14-210-DOC (SH) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2014)

Opinion

No. ED CV 14-210-DOC (SH)

12-22-2014

ANTHONY PAUL HERNANDEZ NAVARRO, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND (Warden), Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and the action is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: December 22, 2014

/s/_________

DAVID O. CARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Navarro v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 22, 2014
No. ED CV 14-210-DOC (SH) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Navarro v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY PAUL HERNANDEZ NAVARRO, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND (Warden)…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 22, 2014

Citations

No. ED CV 14-210-DOC (SH) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2014)