From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navarro v. Golden State Claims Adjusters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 18, 2018
No. 3:16-cv-1147-S (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:16-cv-1147-S

09-18-2018

ARTHUR I NAVARRO and NANCY T. NAVARRO, individually and on behalf of their minor children, Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN STATE CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 27, 2018, the Court finds that the Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. The Court hereby DENIES the Navarros' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Defendant Preferred Contractors Insurance Company, RRG ("PCIC") [Dkt. No. 41], GRANTS PCIC's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 59], and DENIES PCIC's Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. No. 59].

SO ORDERED this 18th day of September, 2018.

/s/_________

KAREN GREN SCHOLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Navarro v. Golden State Claims Adjusters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 18, 2018
No. 3:16-cv-1147-S (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2018)
Case details for

Navarro v. Golden State Claims Adjusters

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR I NAVARRO and NANCY T. NAVARRO, individually and on behalf of their…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 18, 2018

Citations

No. 3:16-cv-1147-S (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2018)