Navarrete v. Meyer

Full title: MIRIUM NAVARRETE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HAYLEY MEYER…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division

Date published: Jul 22, 2015

No. D067454 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 22, 2015)

Opinion

Page 999a

238 Cal.App.4th 999a __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ MIRIUM NAVARRETE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HAYLEY MEYER, Defendant and Respondent. D067454 California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division July 22, 2015

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, No. RIC1100243 Matthew Perantoni, Judge.

THE COURT

.IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on June 22, 2015, 237 Cal.App.4th 1276; ___Cal.Rptr.3d ___ be modified as follows:

On page 8 [237 Cal.App.4th 1284, advance report, 1st full par., line 9], second paragraph, line 8, the sentence beginning with "Meyer's complaint need only ..." should be changed to "Navarette's complaint need only...." The full sentence should now read as follows:

Navarette's complaint need only meet fact-pleading requirements; it must contain " '[a] statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language' " and should "allege ultimate facts that 'as a whole apprise[] the adversary of the factual basis of the claim." " There is no change in judgment.