From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nava v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0037 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0037 KJN P

01-18-2012

JOSE A.V. NAVA, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Therefore, petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

____________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
nava0037.101a


Summaries of

Nava v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0037 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Nava v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:JOSE A.V. NAVA, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0037 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)