From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nautilus Land Owners Corp. v. Gilbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1998
253 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 28, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants installed a fence around their property in 1982. That same year, the plaintiff's representative wrote to the defendants to inform them that their newly-installed fence was on the plaintiff's property and should be moved. The defendants never moved the fence. This action, which was commenced approximately 13 years later, is barred by the applicable 10-year Statute of Limitations ( see, CPLR 212 [a]).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nautilus Land Owners Corp. v. Gilbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1998
253 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Nautilus Land Owners Corp. v. Gilbert

Case Details

Full title:NAUTILUS LAND OWNERS CORPORATION, Respondent, v. STUART GILBERT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

Morgan v. Suco

Pursuant to CPLR 212(a), "[a]n action to recover real property or its possession cannot be commenced unless…

Morgan v. Suco

Pursuant to CPLR 212(a), "[a]n action to recover real property or its possession cannot be commenced unless…