From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nauman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 2, 1996
918 S.W.2d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 67841.

February 27, 1996. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ROBERT CAMPBELL, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals from the motion court's judgment denying Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Nauman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 2, 1996
918 S.W.2d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Nauman v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS NAUMAN, MOVANT/APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 2, 1996

Citations

918 S.W.2d 283 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)