From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naughton v. Wenerowicz

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 2010
2:10cv719, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

2:10cv719, Electronic Filing.

July 6, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2010, after a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus was filed by the petitioner, James Naughton, and after a Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was issued, and the petitioner was directed to file written objections within fourteen days, and after the petitioner submitted a letter, treated as objections, and upon consideration of those objections, and after independent review of the petition and the record, and after consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which is adopted and incorporated as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition of James Naughton for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED, and that a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exists.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the F.R.App.P., if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order, he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 F.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Naughton v. Wenerowicz

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 2010
2:10cv719, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Naughton v. Wenerowicz

Case Details

Full title:JAMES NAUGHTON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

2:10cv719, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2010)