Argued February 26, 1918
Decided March 12, 1918
Clinton B. Gibbs for appellant.
Karl A. McCormick for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; first question certified answered in the negative; second question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND and ANDREWS, JJ.
Full title:CHARLES NAUD, Respondent, v . KING SEWING MACHINE COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 12, 1918
That plaintiff erroneously attempted to take action under the workmen's compensation act which, as construed…
Blaine v. Huttig Sash Door Co.s Co., 251 Mich. 393, 232 N.W. 201; Section 3301, R.S. Mo. 1929; Gillmore v. Ring Const. Co. (Mo. App.). 61…