From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naturalite v. Forner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 12, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-CV-13564 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-CV-13564

09-12-2011

JAMI NATURALITE, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY FORNER, et al., Defendants.


HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen, issued on June 1, 2011 (Dkt. 48). The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Dkt. 4) be denied. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R despite being granted an extension of time in which to do so (Dkt. 59). Thus, Plaintiff has waived any further right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). In any event, the Court has reviewed the R&R and finds that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct result for the correct reasons. Therefore, the Court accepts and adopts the R&R as the findings and conclusions of the Court and denies Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.

SO ORDERED. Dated: September 12, 2011

Flint, Michigan

MARK A. GOLDSMITH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Naturalite v. Forner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 12, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-CV-13564 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Naturalite v. Forner

Case Details

Full title:JAMI NATURALITE, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY FORNER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-CV-13564 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 12, 2011)