Natt v. Wolf

Full title: RAJWINDER SINGH NATT #A201-917-735 v. CHAD WOLF ET AL

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 15, 2020

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00427 SEC P (W.D. La. Jul. 15, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00427 SEC P

07-15-2020

RAJWINDER SINGH NATT #A201-917-735 v. CHAD WOLF ET AL

JUDGE DRELL

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 10) and after a de novo review of the record including the Objection filed by Petitioner (ECF No. 12), and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (ECF No. 2) is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. In so ruling, we note that the Ninth Circuit opinion upon which Petitioner relies has been reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court. See Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, ___US___, 140 S.Ct. 1959 (June 25, 2020). There is no Suspension Clause violation.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, this 15^TH day of July, 2020.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT