From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Natt v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-0261-P (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-0261-P

03-19-2020

RAJWINDER SINGH NATT, Petitioner v. CHAD WOLF, ET AL., Respondents


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 7), noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition (ECF No. 1) and Motion to Stay (ECF No. 2) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 19th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Natt v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-0261-P (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Natt v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:RAJWINDER SINGH NATT, Petitioner v. CHAD WOLF, ET AL., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-0261-P (W.D. La. Mar. 19, 2020)