From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Natl. Surety v. President Directors of Manhattan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

February, 1929.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.; Proskauer, J., dissents on the ground that, although the defendants' legal position is entirely sound, it was error to dismiss the complaint before the plaintiff had rested and after the court had reserved decision on the plaintiff's motion to strike out the defenses, with a privilege to the defendants' counsel to introduce further evidence if his motion were denied. [ 133 Misc. 48.]


Judgment affirmed, with costs to the defendant President and Directors of the Manhattan Company against the plaintiff. No opinion.


Summaries of

Natl. Surety v. President Directors of Manhattan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Natl. Surety v. President Directors of Manhattan

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1929

Citations

225 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)