From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fuyao Glass Am., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 30, 2018
Case No. 3:18-mc-2 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 30, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-mc-2

08-30-2018

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Applicant, v. FUYAO GLASS AMERICA, INC., Respondent.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) APPLICANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (DOC. 5) BE GRANTED; AND (2) THIS CASE BE TERMINATED ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

Attached hereto is a NOTICE to the parties regarding objections to this Report and Recommendation.

This miscellaneous case is presently before the Court on the National Labor Relations Board's ("NLRB") motion to withdraw its application seeking enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum. Doc. 5. For good cause shown, and absent opposition, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the NLRB's motion to withdraw (doc. 5) be GRANTED and this case be TERMINATED on the Court's docket. Date: August 30, 2018

s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Report and Recommendation. This period is not extended by virtue of Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) if served on you by electronic means, such as via the Court's CM/ECF filing system. If, however, this Report and Recommendation was served upon you by mail, this deadline is extended to SEVENTEEN DAYS by application of Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). Parties may seek an extension of the deadline to file objections by filing a motion for extension, which the Court may grant upon a showing of good cause.

Any objections filed shall specify the portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based, in whole or in part, upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs.

A party may respond to another party's objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. As noted above, this period is not extended by virtue of Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) if served on you by electronic means, such as via the Court's CM/ECF filing system. If, however, this Report and Recommendation was served upon you by mail, this deadline is extended to SEVENTEEN DAYS by application of Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).

Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 153-55 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).


Summaries of

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fuyao Glass Am., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 30, 2018
Case No. 3:18-mc-2 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fuyao Glass Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Applicant, v. FUYAO GLASS AMERICA, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Aug 30, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:18-mc-2 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 30, 2018)