From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Ass'n of the Deaf v. Siriusxm Holdings Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 9, 2022
1:21-cv-10542-JPO (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-10542-JPO

11-09-2022

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF on behalf of itself and its members, REBECCA ALEXANDER, JAZMINE JONES, AMBER MARTIN, JAMES MUNRO, and MEI NISHIMOTO Plaintiffs, v. SIRIUSXM HOLDINGS INC., STITCHER MEDIA INC., and PANDORA MEDIA LLC, Defendants.

Joshua Morris Rosenthal Rebecca Catherine Serbin Rebecca Juliet Rodgers Joshua Morris Rosenthal Disability Rights Advocates Leah Wiederhorn The National Association of the Deaf Counsel for Plaintiffs Benjamin S. Chasan Lee A. Armstrong Allison L. Waks Benjamin S. Chasan JONES DAY Robert Naeve (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY Robert Naeve Jones Day Counsel for Sirius XM Holdings Inc., Stitcher Media LLC, and Pandora Media, LLC


Joshua Morris Rosenthal Rebecca Catherine Serbin Rebecca Juliet Rodgers Joshua Morris Rosenthal Disability Rights Advocates Leah Wiederhorn The National Association of the Deaf Counsel for Plaintiffs

Benjamin S. Chasan Lee A. Armstrong Allison L. Waks Benjamin S. Chasan JONES DAY Robert Naeve (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY Robert Naeve Jones Day Counsel for Sirius XM Holdings Inc., Stitcher Media LLC, and Pandora Media, LLC

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER

J. PAULOETKEN United States District Judge

WHEREAS, the Parties having agreed to the following terms of confidentiality, and the Court having found that good cause exists for the issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby

ORDERED that the following restrictions and procedures shall apply to the information and documents exchanged by the Parties in connection with the pre-trial phase of this action:

1. Counsel for any party may designate any document or information, in whole or in part, as confidential if counsel determines, in good faith, that such designation is necessary to protect the interests of the client in information that is proprietary or a trade secret, Personal Information (e.g., social security numbers, financial account numbers, passwords, and information that may be used for identity theft), or medical and other information related to any party or non-party's disability. If any party believes that a document or information not described in this paragraph should be treated as confidential, it may meet and confer with opposing counsel and, in the absence of a resolution, it may seek resolution by the Court, which shall grant the application only for good cause shown.

2. Information and documents designated by a party as confidential will be stamped “CONFIDENTIAL.”

3. The Confidential Information disclosed will be held and used by the person receiving such information solely for use in connection with the action.

4. In the event a party challenges another party's designation of confidentiality, counsel shall make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute within fourteen (14) days of the challenging party raising the dispute, the challenging party may seek resolution by the Court.

5. Nothing in this Protective Order constitutes an admission by any party that Confidential Information disclosed in this case is relevant or admissible. Each party reserves the right to object to the use or admissibility of the Confidential Information.

6. The Parties should meet and confer if any production requires a designation of “For Attorneys' or Experts' Eyes Only.”

7. Documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall not be disclosed to any person, except:

a. The requesting party and counsel, including in-house counsel;
b. Employees and staff of such counsel assisting in the litigation;
c. Consultants or experts assisting in the prosecution or defense of the matter, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel;
d. Court reporters; and
e. The Court (including the mediator, or other person having access to any Confidential Information by virtue of his or her position with the Court).

8. Prior to disclosing or displaying the Confidential Information to any person other than those defined in subparagraphs 7(a)-(b), (d)-(e), counsel must:

a. Inform the person of the confidential nature of the information or documents;
b. Inform the person that this Court has enjoined the use of the information or documents by him/her for any purpose other than this litigation and has enjoined the disclosure of the information or documents to any other person; and c. Require each such person to sign an agreement to be bound by this Order in the form attached hereto.

9. The disclosure of a document or information without designating it as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall not constitute a waiver of the right to designate such document or information as Confidential Information. If so designated, the document or information shall thenceforth be treated as Confidential Information subject to all the terms of this Stipulation and Order. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude any party from disputing a subsequent designation pursuant to paragraph 4.

10. During a deposition, or within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a deposition transcript, any party may designate as confidential specific portions of the transcript that contain Confidential Information as defined in paragraph 1. Any disputes regarding the transcript, or any portions thereof, shall be governed by paragraph 4.

11. Any Confidential Information exchanged in discovery shall be maintained by the receiving party in a manner that is secure and confidential and shared only with authorized individuals in a secure manner. In the event the party who received Confidential Information experiences a data breach, it shall immediately notify the producing party and cooperate with the producing party to address and remedy the breach. Nothing herein shall preclude the producing party from asserting legal claims or constitute a waiver of legal rights and defenses in the event of litigation arising out of the receiving party's failure to appropriately protect Confidential Information from unauthorized disclosure.

12. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502, the production of privileged or work-product protected documents or communications, electronically stored information (“ESI”) or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, shall not constitute a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production.

13. Notwithstanding the designation of information as “confidential” in discovery, there is no presumption that such information shall be filed with the Court under seal. The Parties shall follow the Court's procedures with respect to filing under seal.

14. At the conclusion of litigation, Confidential Information and any copies thereof shall be promptly (and in no event later than 30 days after entry of final judgment no longer subject to further appeal) returned to the producing party or certified as destroyed, except that the Parties' counsel shall be permitted to retain their working files on the condition that those files will remain protected.

15. Nothing herein shall preclude the Parties from disclosing material designated to be Confidential Information if otherwise required by law or pursuant to a valid subpoena.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

SO ORDERED

I,___, have been informed by counsel that certain documents or information to be disclosed to me in connection with the matter entitled have been designated as confidential. I have been informed that any such documents or information labeled “CONFIDENTIAL” are confidential by Order of the Court.

I hereby agree that I will not disclose any information contained in such documents to any other person. I further agree not to use any such information for any purpose other than this litigation.


Summaries of

Nat'l Ass'n of the Deaf v. Siriusxm Holdings Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 9, 2022
1:21-cv-10542-JPO (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Nat'l Ass'n of the Deaf v. Siriusxm Holdings Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF on behalf of itself and its members…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 9, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-10542-JPO (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2022)