Opinion
8:21-mc-00008-MSS-AEP
02-23-2024
NATIONWIDE JUDGMENT RECOVERY, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICO VARGAS, Defendant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Garnishee.
ORDER
ANTHONY E. PORCELLI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Garnishment and Memorandum of Law (Doc. 47). A judgment in the amount of $46,815.71 in Plaintiff's favor was entered in the action between the parties on August 14, 2017, in the District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, which was subsequently registered in the District Court for the Middle District of Florida on January 20, 2021 (Doc. 1). See 28 U.S.C. § 1963. According to Plaintiff, the judgment, plus post-judgment interest, remains unsatisfied. Plaintiff believes that Defendant may have a bank account or other property in the possession or control of the Garnishee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and, by the instant motion, now requests that the Court issue a writ of garnishment directed to Garnishee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in order to recover on the outstanding judgment.
Pursuant to Rule 69, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court must follow state law regarding execution of a judgment. Florida Statutes § 77.01 et. seq. allows recovery of a money judgment via a writ of garnishment. Thus, the Court may enforce the judgment through a writ of garnishment pursuant to Florida law. Upon consideration, the Court finds good cause to grant the motion. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Garnishment (Doc. 47) is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk is hereby directed to issue a Writ of Garnishment upon Garnishee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
3. As Defendant Americo Vargas is an individual, the Clerk is hereby directed to attach the required notice to Defendant Americo Vargas pursuant to Florida Statutes § 77.041(1) to the writ of garnishment.
DONE AND ORDERED