Summary
reversing final summary judgment in favor of borrowers on authority of Brindise
Summary of this case from Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. LanhamOpinion
No. 1D15–4794.
09-09-2016
Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale and Eric M. Levine of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for Appellant. Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellees.
Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale and Eric M. Levine of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the final summary judgment entered in favor of Appellees, and remand for reinstatement of the foreclosure action and proceedings on the merits. See Brindise v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 183 So.3d 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 2016 WL 1122325, at *1 (Fla.2016) (rejecting borrowers' argument that the notice requirement of section 559.715 of the Florida Statutes applies in foreclosure actions); McCall v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 186 So.3d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (affirming judgment for lender on authority of Brindise ).
BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.